Saturday 8 July 2017

Movie Review Repost -- The Lone Ranger (2013)

The season of summer blockbusters is upon us! Let's take a look back at a highly anticipated, big-budget one from a few years back, The Lone Ranger. I like western films and I was actually looking forward to this one. Unfortunately it turned out to be a real disappointment, with a lame hero, a bloated run time, and general nonsense. It ended up being one of the biggest box office bombs of the year thanks to its astoundingly high budget of approximately $260 million. While I now realize that it's OK for a western to take an occasional dive into the realm of over-the-top-ness, the fact remains that this movie is a catastrophe that should be remembered. So let's have a moment of silence for this film that could've been so awesome if its script was just tweaked a little bit.

  Two-and-a-half hours. Ugh. So for those of you who don't know, The Lone Ranger (2013) is pretty much a remake of The Legend of the Lone Ranger (1981) except with no plot to kidnap the president. We've had enough presidential action movies for one summer.
  It follows ex-Ranger John Reid and his Native American friend Tonto on their quest for revenge and justice against the guys who murdered their loved ones and are engineering a war to profit off of. It is a drawn-out story involving unoriginal plot lines and a title character who dates his brother Dan's widow just days after her husband's death. What a nice guy. In fact for most of the movie the Lone Ranger (Armie Hammer) is kind of a weenie. He is largely overshadowed by his eccentric sidekick Tonto played by Johnny Depp who unfortunately is about as Native as me. For villains we have Butch Cavendish, the cannibalistic murderer who looks a lot like Captain Barbossa (this film was made by the same guys who did POTC, you know). Our other villain is railroad tycoon Latham Cole (AKA Lord Bosscrime).
  One of the things you'll notice rather quickly about this film is that the studios involved tried to make it appropriate for children but also appealing to adults. This makes the film into a clumsy combination of sometimes dumb jokes (including poop jokes) and surprisingly graphic violence for a Disney film. The whole movie is told through flashbacks by Tonto (who of course can recall in great detail events that he was not present to witness), and this only serves to both pad out the already long run time and to make the film more child-friendly. Just like with Pirates of the Caribbean, the action scenes are terrifically over-the-top spectacles: the kind where people are thrown and tossed around like rag dolls and yet never seem to break any bones. These kinds of overblown action scenes seem ill-suited to the western genre which is normally more grounded in reality. Nevertheless one thing that this movie does extremely well is the setting. The highly-detailed sets and the panoramic longshots look amazing.
  Sadly, Lone Ranger drops the ball on so many occasions. Characters will inexplicably become stupid for the sake of plot convenience, while other characters will suddenly remember how to speak a second language halfway through a scene! The running gag of people not understanding the mask was not funny at all. The one-legged prostitute chick was pointless; she has about four minutes of screen time and in the grand scheme of things doesn't really matter much. Additionally there are so many things that don't make any sense whatsoever. Like how did Tonto get so good a making bullets? How can a horse pull a buried person out of the ground by only that person's teeth? Why was a stationary ceremonial train full of passengers? Why does Cole allow Cavendish to walk around out in the open even after showing his wanted poster to everybody? Does Cole really think the railroad board members are just going to let him get away with his illegal takeover of the company? Why was that part even necessary? I'd think that by this stage in the movie the audience is already pretty sure that he's a bad guy.
  In short, the Lone Ranger is an overblown, over-hyped, over-budgeted mess of a western that tries appealing to too many people at once. It's comparable to POTC; it isn't as needlessly complicated but it somehow manages to have the same run time. Really the only people who I can recommend this film for is western fans – beggars can't be choosers, right? – and Johnny Depp fans. This movie should've been called The Adventures of Tonto and his Weenie Sidekick, the Lone Ranger.

Rating: one-and-a-half stars out of five.

No comments:

Post a Comment