Friday 15 January 2016

Band of Brothers Vs. The Pacific

   Which HBO miniseries is better: Band of Brothers or The Pacific? It is a question that has plagued mankind since... well, since 2010 I guess. Actually “plagued” might be too strong a word; most people agree that BoB (2001) is the superior 10 part non-fiction Second World War series. But that's not to say that The Pacific (TP, 2010) was bad or anything. They're both very good; I must've watched them both a half-dozen times or so. Both series have their strong points and shortcomings. Today I'm going to go over the strengths and weaknesses of both series and determine just how correct the majority is on this one.

Theme, Mood, and Tone
   Let's begin with the biggest difference between the two miniseries: the theme. One need not look further than the shows' titles to learn what their themes are. Band of Brothers is about a group of men who fight together throughout the war and form special bonds. It's about the comradeship that develops between them by their shared experiences. In sharp contrast, The Pacific focuses more on the effects of a hostile, unfamiliar, and chaotic environment on the individuals involved in fighting. It seeks to portray the emotional and psychological realities of the war on its participants. These are two very different themes, as different as the conflicts that they depict. For example BoB explores themes like duty, bravery, brotherly love, and responsibility whereas TP brings up themes like survival, hate, fear, ungratefulness, stress, and loss. This makes sense seeing how the European Theatre of Operations is remembered as a noble struggle to free people from fascism, whereas the war in the Pacific took place in hostile, dirty environments, amongst unfamiliar cultures, and against an enemy no one knew much about. Similarly, it's normally the European theatre of operations that is glorified in pop culture, while the Pacific War remains largely misunderstood. It is important to note that both series make a strong effort at portraying realism; it's just that the two conflicts were very different in nature and thus warranted a different understanding. This is perfectly exemplified by a quick scene in The Pacific's last episode, where a cab driver – a former paratrooper – refuses to take a marine's money out of respect for all the tough crap that he had been through in the Pacific War.
Both series also have very different endings, and it's not hard to guess which series is more uplifting. Band of Brothers will leave you happy, The Pacific will make you cry.

Story, Narrative, and Characters
   As with all good stories, the themes of these two series are vitally embedded within their stories. Let's begin by looking at Band of Brothers. Based off the Stephen Ambrose book of the same name, this series follows Easy Company (2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment) and everything they go through from boot camp in 1942 all the way to their occupation of Austria in August 1945. Dick Winters (lieutenant, then captain, then major) serves as the series' main-ish character; while some episodes have main characters of their own, he's still a major supporting character throughout. As he rises through the ranks, Winters learns how to take responsibility for fighting the war while at the same time looking out for the welfare of his men. Meanwhile, the dozens of supporting characters under him must each overcome the physical and emotional obstacles that confront them throughout the war. By the end, everybody (everybody who survives, anyways) finds a way through it all, making for a happy ending.
   In terms of narrative, The Pacific could not be any more dissimilar. This series was based on no less than four books and it follows three main characters – John Basilone, Robert Leckie, and Eugene Sledge – all of whom served in the First Marine Division. However since these three didn't really serve together in the same units or at the same times, the narrative switches focus frequently, often within a single episode. Generally speaking, the first few episodes are about Basilone and Leckie, the middle few are mostly about Leckie and Sledge, and the last few are almost completely about Sledge. If I recall correctly, there's only a couple scenes where two share screen time together. The three Marines are each affected differently by the war. Basilone ends up becoming a reluctant hero after Guadalcanal, but he still feels the need to fulfill his duty to the Corps. A smartass seeking adventure, Robert Leckie has his confidence greatly shaken up by the war, but after returning home he bounces back. Eugene Sledge – arguably the main character of the series – is a young idealist whose world is turned upside down by the barbarity of the war. He struggles to hold on to his faith and compassion, and after returning home he has great difficulty fitting back in. Needless to say, there's quite a lot of variety in character arcs to be found here. Like BoB, TP's cast contains a multitude of supporting characters but they aren't nearly as developed or memorable. Honestly, I still have trouble remembering a lot of their names despite having watched every episode several times.
   As you might have guessed, The Pacific's narrative is much less linear; it bounces around time and space a lot. Again this isn't unlike the Pacific War's campaign itself, what with US troops leapfrogging back and forth across islands that no marine had heard of before. Since we're not following just one unit, this means we get to see the war's scope on a much larger scale. In addition to combat, we see characters enlist, leave home, train, date, go on leave, and return home. (The return home is by far the most interesting of these scenarios.) There's even a few female characters, something BoB had none of.

Action
   The action scenes are also affected by the series' respective scope. For instance, since Band of Brothers follows a whole company of characters, the battle scenes show the progression of the whole battle from multiple participants' points of view (similar to Saving Private Ryan, but on a larger scale). On the flipside, The Pacific's battle scenes only show the action to the extent of the main character's involvement. For example, if there is a battle involving John Basilone then only the parts directly involving Basilone would be shown. The tone of the action scenes are also very different. In keeping with its overall tone, TP's action is always serious, intense, gritty, violent, and dirty. BoB, while it can sometimes be gritty as well, isn't quite as intense, but more dramatic, fast-paced, and even humourous at times.
   Unfortunately, The Pacific's action scenes seem to blend in after a while. A lot of the locations look similar, making it hard to gauge progress and remember the places' names. Band of Brothers' action is more built up – perhaps by virtue of having a commanding officer as a main character – and thus ends up being more memorable.

Other Differences
   As mentioned above, each series has certain advantages over the other. Here's a brief list of what each one did better:
  • Most Band of Brothers episodes begin with some brief quotes from the real life Easy Company veterans. The interviewees' identities aren't revealed until the end of the last episode.
  • Band of Brothers episodes actually have titles, whereas The Pacific's episodes are just numbered (Part 1, Part 2, etc.). Pay attention, HBO: if you're watching either series from a box set, episode titles make it way easier to remember where you left off!
  • Each episode of TP begins with a map indicating what part of the world the story is unfolding in.
  • BoB has some stand-alone episodes that can be watched on their own. Try doing that with an episode of TP, and you'll be lost.
  • Both series have very good acting, but The Pacific should be commended for bringing onboard actors who are age-appropriate for their roles. BoB's actors all look 5-10 years too old.
  • The Pacific has the much better epilogue, showing real-world photographs of each character and detailing what happened to them later on in their lives.
Alos, both series display roughly the same amount of historical accuracy; the main events are done fairly accurately, but some smaller things got changed around a bit for the sake of drama.

Conclusion
   Comparing Band of Brothers to The Pacific reminds me a lot of an exercise in my WWI history class where we had to compare Ernst Jünger's Storm of Steel to Louis Barthas' Poilu. The two accounts of the war experience was very different, but both were very well executed. One series portrays – some might say, glorifies – a “company of heroes” working together to fulfill their duties. The other is a much more personal story of a few individuals trying to stay alive and retain their souls during moments that are not always easy to watch.
   While both series are good, I'd have to agree with the majority that Band of Brothers is the greater of the two thanks to its more memorable characters and more satisfying action scenes. The Pacific falls short by virtue of its counter-intuitive, sometimes unfocused narrative. TP took more risks with how it did things, and as a result ends up being closer to modern, anti-war film territory (it invokes how today's soldiers have to make sense of being sent off to unfamiliar parts of the world to fight enemies that they don't understand). Since it's relevant for a modern audience and it portrays a slice of WWII that doesn't receive as much popular attention as it deserves, I'd be willing to say that The Pacific is the more important of the two series. But as far as entertainment value goes, Band of Brothers is better overall.

   Curahee!

No comments:

Post a Comment