It's not easy to write these reviews
when there's a cat sitting between you and the computer. Anyways,
Thor: The Dark World! (Damn you, Willy for ruining my intro!)
Thor 2 was OK. Really OK. It follows
Thor and his girlfriend Jane Foster as they strive to defend the Nine
Realms against the no-longer-dormant threat of the Dark Elves who
have located the no-longer-missing ultimate weapon, the Aether. In
addition to some fun new characters we're also treated to all the
classic ones from the previous film, all brilliantly acted. This
includes Loki, the most entertaining Marvel movie villain ever, the
guy who steals every scene he's in and keeps you guessing as to what
he's going to do next.
At times the story seems rather
rushed, especially in the beginning where it seems as if we're given
a lot to swallow in 15-20 minutes. The same can be said of the
fighting scenes; they often end abruptly with a very fast move that
you can't really see. This movie also ends in a not-unpredictable
cliffhanger. The mid-credits scene is a great big WTF moment and, let
me tell you, the post-credits scene is pointless. Don't waste your
time waiting for it.
As with the first Thor movie, The Dark
World has good special effects and is really funny when it wants to
be (although some of the jokes were kind of predictable).
Unfortunately, the film's main
villain, Malekith (or Malarkey as I call him), isn't all that
interesting. He commands an army of dark elves who carry cool weapons
and can turn into Hulk-like monsters but wear these silly-looking
masks that make me chuckle. And please tell me: why exactly do they
want to destroy the universe anyways? Also, the Asgardians apparently
just rebuilt the Bifrost that Thor destroyed in the previous film,
thus completely validating one of my complaints from that film two
years ago.
In short, Thor: The Dark World is an
OK film, but not nearly as good as the first. The story isn't as
complete and the characters aren't as developed. In the first Thor
movie, characters learn lessons and go through changes. The sequel,
on the other hand, is just one of those good-guy-fights-bad-guy
movies. But for what it is, it's entertaining enough and worth seeing
once.
Rating: three stars out of five.
No comments:
Post a Comment