I'm calling it: there has never been a
better time to be a Marvel superhero fanatic. Case in point: Captain
America: Civil War, the highly
anticipated, yet puzzlingly titled sequel to 2014's Winter
Soldier, one of the best
superhero movies ever made. Can this one live up to the hype? Is it a
better superhero vs. superhero movie than Batman v
Superman: Dawn of Justice? Let's
find out.
Taking
place about a year after Age of Ultron,
the story follows (most of) the Avengers, who are under fire by
people who have suffered personal and financial losses due to the
heroes' destructive globe-trotting exploits. When the UN proposes an
oversight agreement to make the super-team more accountable, the
heroes are split into two opposing factions. Captain America leads
the side opposed to it, while Iron Man leads the side in favour of
it. The two sides clash, deeper stuff goes on, the plot thickens. The
story is partially based off the 2006 event comic of the same name,
though it drifts pretty far from the original story, especially
towards the end. While I did like that comic (most people didn't)
it's probably better that the movie did its own thing (though it does
keep true to the whole “vilify Iron Man” thing). It provides for
some pretty cool plot twists. It's just a shame that the whole Civil
War part is left partially unresolved at the end. Like Winter
Soldier, Civil War
takes on the feel of a spy-thriller movie rather than a cartoony
adventure. The movie raises an important issue of political nature,
but just like the previous movie they sidestep around the debate when
(SPOILER ALERT) it's revealed that it was all the work of Hydra.
What, are we just supposed to forget about that grieving mother who
talked with Tony Stark near the beginning? Was she
a Hydra agent too?
As you
probably already know, Civil War
boasts an all-star cast full of your favourite Marvel Cinematic
Universe heroes of the past eight years or so. Pretty much the only
ones missing are Thor, Hulk, and Nick Fury. In their place we get
Spider-man, Ant Man, Black Panther, and even General Ross from way
back, from 2008's Incredible Hulk.
In fact there's so many characters that it begs the question of why
this is considered a Captain America movie and not an Avengers movie.
A significant amount of screen time (I'd say around 50%) doesn't
feature Cap. This is just as much an Iron Man movie as it is a
Captain America movie. Oh well, I guess it's not that big a deal.
I have
to say, the new Spider-man is great. Played by Tom Holland, he's a
fun character to see in action, though I did think his voice was a
little too high-pitched. His Ditko-esque costume looks great. They
must have borrowed from the Deadpool
playbook in giving his mask some measure of expression through the
moving eyes. Well done.
I also
like what they did with the Winter Soldier. He's still a tortured and
intense character, but he now has no problem being a team player.
He's even capable of taking part in jokes. This
is how character development should be done.
With
the Russo brothers in the director's chair(s), we get the same level
of high-quality production we saw in Winter Soldier.
However there were just a couple things that bothered me. First, the
action scenes in the first half-hour or so are not easy to watch. It
suffers from the old familiar combination of shaky cam and choppy
editing. The rest of the movie looks OK, though. Another thing I
noticed is that a couple of the subtitles (from spoken Russian) have
grammar errors! For instance, rather than congratulating Bucky on his
completed mission (“Well done, soldier.”), some dude instead sees
fit to inform Bucky on how he likes his soldiers cooked (“Well done
soldier.”).
There
were also a couple plot points/holes that disappointed me. It's
mentioned early on that Tony Stark and Pepper Potts' relationship
isn't doing so well. This is never brought up again, almost as if
there was no point in it even being mentioned. There's also this part
which looks like it's setting up a bunch of new villains for the
heroes to fight towards the end, but this opportunity was completely
wasted – by an off-screen event, no less!
In
conclusion, Captain America: Civil War
is amazing! I know I complained a lot, but I critique because I care.
OK? This movie is fun, at least as good as 2011's Captain
America: First Avenger. It's
(mostly) well-made and it really feels like crap is on the line. The
film's universe is being shaken around and stuff is truly changing
and I love it when that kind of thing happens to an established
franchise.
Grade:
four out of five.
No comments:
Post a Comment