Has it really been two
years since the remake of It came out? I remember it being a
well-put together picture with plenty of good scares, some good
acting, and a charmingly creepy setting. I also remember that it was
only half the story told in the novel (and TV miniseries), showing
only the Loser Club's harrowing struggle against a supernatural evil
in 1989 as children. So how does the modern-day second outing stack
up against the retro one? Let's find out.
It is 2016 and a new
string of It-pattern murders are popping up which prompts Loser Club
member Mike to gather the other, now grown-up losers (who are all
rich now) back to Derry, Maine, to finish off the killer clown
Pennywise once and for all. It's a story that ties in nicely with the
first with a lot of flashbacks. However, a lot of these flashbacks
end up retconning the previous film, railroading in a bunch of the
kids' confrontations with It that weren't shown or even mentioned in
the first It. But that's nothing compared to It: Chapter
2's biggest problem: it's way too long! If you're going to make
me pay to sit still in one place for nearly three hours then you'd
better deliver something that'll make my resisting of going to the
bathroom that whole time worth it (or perhaps an intermission like
the good old days?). Instead there's not one but two generic
inspirational speeches, each Loser has to go searching for old
tokens, the ending takes forever to wrap up, and the characters all
split up and confront It alone... twice! They could have easily
trimmed 45 minutes off and the film would have been better for it.
Tone is everything in a
horror movie and the tone in It: Chapter 2 is sometimes
unfocused. Don't get me wrong, there are a bunch of decent scares,
Pennywise's kills are rather brutal, and the visual design and
effects on the film's various monsters are freaky. But unlike the
last film comedy pervades almost every scene. Oftentimes just as
something frightening is about to happen somebody does something that
ends up being funny rather than unsettling, thus ruining the tone. In
other scenes the jokes work fine – and they're downright hilarious
at times – but overall It: Chapter 2 is far less scary than
its predecessor.
What Chapter 2
does copy from the first is a great cast that all have good chemistry
together. While Bill Skarsgard does just as good a job as before in
the role of Pennywise, new faces such as Jessica Chastain, James
McAvoy, and Bill Hader give splendid performances of their own.
Stephen King himself even makes a cameo appearance as a pawnshop
owner who is disappointed in novels that have lousy endings. Henry
Bowers, the bully from the last film, returns to menace the Losers
some more but his presence in this film is kind of wasted.
I also couldn't help
but notice that there's some gaps in logic. For example it's
established early on that since she previously saw It's deadlights
Beverly knows how each of the Losers is going to die. But after the
first death, this ability never comes into play nor is it mentioned
again. Also, we see that in 2016 body parts are washing up in Derry's
river and has made front page news in that town. So why has it not
made national news? And when you think about it It kind of sucks at
catching people. He wastes time messing around with his prey and as
long as you can run and avoid falling for his tricks then you'll be
fine, even if you're just a kid.
Regardless, It:
Chapter 2 is simply OK, a far cry from the one we got two years
ago. It runs for much too long, the script could have used another
edit or two, and the experience isn't as scary as the one before it.
Basically a handful of good scares, a bunch of laughs, and a few
standout performances are all that keep this one afloat.
Grade:
This sums it up very well. Thanks Tony.
ReplyDelete